Evolution vs. Creationism Essay -- essays research papers

ontogeny vs. CreationismThe Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of birth of Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwins conclusion that organisms descended from a common ancestor modified by the apparatus of natural selection resulting in the evolution of species adapting to their environment. The following are the of import geological topics concerning creationism radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is nothing more than a infants fairytale that lacks any scientific proof. The aspect of radiometric dating is polemical to most creationists on the grounds that it is unreliable and has error factors. One creationist points turn up a living mollusk was once shown by carbon-14 dating to be dead for 3,000 years (Geology). There are several things wrong with this idea. Creationists wh o pertinacious this value utilise carbon 14 dating which is useful for find out the age of organism 50,000 years former(a). It is not suitable to be used for such a young organism, so the creationists make it seem as if there is something incorrect with the technique which leads to incorrect dates. Even the biggest errors, found in Carbon 14 dating, do not correspond to the 6000 year old earth that the Bible suggests. Its almost as if they are nerve-racking to create problems on the purpose so they can prove...