Friday, December 14, 2018
'Branding Essay\r'
'BRANDING ESSAY Subject: The  shuffling as an aspirational and  heathen agent 14/03/2013  jibe to Philip J. Kotler ââ¬Å"a  grade is a name, term, sign  type or design, or a combination of them to  detect the goods or services of one seller or a group of sellers and to identify them from the competitorsââ¬Â. This definition  express mailes the  marque as the sum of the representations that we have, however, the  stag is also a cultural agent. To remain permanently in the  take c be of the  fine-tuner brands  must(prenominal)  progress a recognizable brand and offer their cultural role models to their  guests. indeed it is necessary to  admit this cultural aspect to the  merchandise strategy of the brand.  later explaining how this cultural and aspirational aspect is characterized in the  listens of consumers and brands, it will be interesting to  love its origins and consequences, finally understand why and how a brand builds a culture and a  gruelling  personal identity. The   t   riumph of a brand depends not only on the functional  grade it offers to consumers, its  composition and good health depends heavily on the  emotional value it adds through its products.And the brands gain momentum in todays culture, they seek to  stick mirrors of our personalities and that is why it is indispensable to build a distinctive brand image. The brand locating is to place an image in the mind of the consumer. The success of the brand in the consumers opinion is fundamentally  reliant on its  craving to appropriate the brand and express it as a part of his personality. This cultural  proportionality of the brand had been discussed by Jean-Noel Kapferer (French expert of brands) in his  phonograph recording ââ¬Å"Les marques, capital de lââ¬â¢entrepriseââ¬Â in 1990. He expresses the cultural facet of the brand as a  keystone  broker of brand identity.In the same vein he argues that brands around the products and services sold, build aspirational  population in order    to stand out and sell their products. This universe consists of all intangible assets acting as symbols, references, modus vivendis, emotions  etc. ââ¬Â¦ feature of the brand. This set  castings a  peculiar(prenominal)  notional that illustrates the values and the brand positioning to form a unique cultural  heritage (Jean-Noel Kapferer et Vincent Bastien, Luxe Oblige, 2008) This heritage must be expressed and transmitted to the consumer to  sapidity the desire to join and share.Even if this has a great value in brand equity, it is not enough to form a brand culture. The cornerstone of its creation is a major concept; which is distinct to the brand and  found on an innovative aspect (e. g. Nike and culture transcendence). In this case  on that point is a set of  communion shared by a class of consumers relaying the brand culture. This research of brand culture is becoming  more than and more important, especially beca social function consumers search meaning in their consumption a   nd they need to be involved in this consumer society that is constantly evolving.Similarly, the development of the media and especially the  meshwork makes it fertile ground for the development of this cultural facet. We are part of a brands cultural bath influencing us in all our acts of consumption. The brand is a  promenade of social identification of the individual, our consumption reflects our identity. Especially for brands that  track down as social signs (car brands, clothing, food, telephone, etc. ââ¬Â¦ ). And brands have become cultural facts, when we consume we do not consume only the product but also the brand.  any act of consumption is  exemplary and cultural; there is no longer a pure  technical consumption. The brand becomes a symbol, a materiel  conformation of the myth. So as customers drink, drive or  stand the product, they experience a bit of the myth. ââ¬Â (Douglas B. How Brands  perform Holt in Icons, The Principles of Cultural Branding, 2004). He explain   s this behavior like this: ââ¬Å"Customers use iconic brands as symbolic salves. They grab  chip in of the myth as they use the product as a  federal agency to lessen their identity burdensââ¬Â. It means that the brand through its culture must  withdraw specific models to achieve the desires and soothe the anxieties of consumers.The purpose of brands is to  urinate moments of recognition that put images, sounds, feelings, on the deep desires of customers. Holt adds that a strong brand identity and a  distinctly identifiable culture have a  ordained effect on the brand and business: ââ¬Å"When a brand delivers a powerful myth that customers  mark useful in cementing their identities, this identity value casts a halo on other aspects of the brand. Great myths  parent the brandââ¬â¢s quality reputation, distinctive benefits, and  position value. ââ¬Â This halo effect shows brands cannot underestimate their cultural influence.The  inhering idea in this concept of culture is t   hat it is an  intrinsic part of the brand, but she is not defined consistently. It is  everyday and timeless at the same time it must keep its customers at every change of generation. The success of a brand lies in its ability to  fit to a given society, to know how to react when tensions and desires of consumers mutate. Or that Accordance must match the brand identity.  achiever comes once the brand has articulated the brand identity with market expectations through the  giving medication of a strong brand culture.For example Nike in its infancy  ground its marketing strategy on its philosophy of self-transcendence, a value in accordance with an aspiration of American society in the post-prosperity when the logic of the American  daydream seemed to have lost its splendor. The socio-economic changes constantly and attitudes of societies are transformed. Thus it is essential that brand can find what, in its identity, can meet the expectations of customers in the generational change.    The consumers desire is not focused on a specific good or service, this desire is by  clod (Gilles Deleuze, French philosopher, Anti-Oedipus, 1977).This means that when the customer is considering purchasing, the choice is not just the object itself but to all cultural, symbolic or historic associations attached to them. For example when I want this dress that is behind the showcase, I do not just want this dress, but the  berth that go with the silhouette, the style, the man, the romantic dinner and almost the lifestyle that goes with this dress. And brands need to rethink their communication model to know the consumer interest in all that associations of the product.They can no longer base their identity on customer insights; it must do so on a strong culture. The brand identity is not an element to be overlooked in a marketing strategy because the cultural and aspirational aspect it reveals is becoming  progressively important in the consumers decision. Brands must know how to  n   ominate interest and special recognition in his mind through communicating their values ?? and their major concept. The customersââ¬â¢ expectations continually evolving, that is why it is important for brands to adapt through the establishment of a strong and sustainable brand culture. I hope you understand that as an Erasmus student I used for my research French theories to support my arguments.  healthy I apologize for any mistakes in  slope that I could commit. ) Bibliography * Jean-Noel Kapferer, Les marques, capital de lââ¬â¢entreprise (1990) * Jean-Noel Kapferer et Vincent Bastien, Luxe Oblige, Paris, Eyrolles (2008) * Douglas B. Holt, How Brands Become Icons, The Principles Of Cultural Branding, Harvard Business School Press (2004) * Gilles Deleuze et Felix Guattari, Anti- OEdipe, Editions de Minuit, 1977.\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment