Godhead :: social issues

idolheadOn May 20, 325 AD the world was forever changed. Emperor Constantine called a meeting of the 318 Bishops at Nicea and on that day they instituted ane of the greatest flaws of Ameri tin religion today. This is the doctrine of the collar, suggesting the batch of the Oneness doctrine, believing on one God and His name creation Jesus, is no longer invent. The Trinity doctrine plenty non be proven by simply reading the scriptures it has to be described and explained in detail, before you can begin to see the Trinitarian view. The Trinity doctrine is a doctrine of inference, non a doctrine of fact. If you ever listen or take kick downstairs in a Oneness verses Trinity debate you will flummox that as long as they are quoting scriptures the Trinity looses ground. Hence, the doctrine of the Trinity must be injected into the scriptures to prove itself. One man once utter The Trinity has to be piped into Scripture before it can be piped out.The scoop out example is everyone knows you cant get milk from cotton fiber. But, if you take the cotton and soak it in milk first then you can blackjack the milk from the cotton. In the same sense the Trinity doctrine is manage this. Before you can begin to see the Trinity doctrine, someone has to govern you about it and then go to scripture to prove it as fact. By just reading the scriptures first, no one will ever obtain the Trinity represented, for the scriptures prove the Oneness of Jesus Christ all finished the Bible.I do not understand how the doctrine of the Trinity can get around the unity of the Old will and New Testament stating the One God facts. Deuteronomy 64(NKJV) states Here, O Israel The Lord our God is one Lord. That sums up the doctrine of the Oneness. But, one instance will not satisfy. Here are just a few of the misconceptions of the Trinity doctrine that cause it to be in faultFirst ElohimElohim, meaning God, is sometimes confused to show the plurality of the Godhead, this is not a correc t interpretation. In the Hebrew words are plural in turn of events but singular in the way that they are used. Also the Hebrew often used plural forms to show majesty or grandeur of one person or deity. Even though these are plural words, to say they represent a multiplicity in the Godhead would be wrong.