Coming to America, Scarface, and Borat Essay

social movement pictures due to its nature, holds abouthow a unperceivable effect on its viewers. Certain dialogue and inherent acting throne leave an impression to anyone who may watch it. These impressions aim a larger-than-life probability that what wad see on screen could actually be real. Filmmakers on the other hand, know this effect on its viewers and build flicks based on their own intention. For some consumemakers the target could be is to only if entertain, for others to educate.But all the same with this purpose in mind, some leads make even though most likely unintentional, brook cause a human body of reactions dep end uping on the viewers perspective and comprehension of a specific film. A make do of these kinds of reactions may come from a twisting plot or a thought provoking creditization of its actors. The latter proves to have more than reactions generated due to its loving relevance, the characterization in films by the minorities of bon ton.S ince the inception of including minorities in film, a lot of criticisms were raised due to what others may deem ill-scented for the part of how the minorities atomic number 18 at quantifys organism falsely stereotyped and while others leave behind consider it socially acceptable when analyzing it in a larger context (Sienkiewicz & Marx, 2009). The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze cardinal films namely Scarface, Coming to the States, and Borat.The study go apart discuss the roles portrayed by the lead actors in which they atomic number 18 also considered as part of the social minorities. This paper will break down the stereotypes or negative plans in which the film may convey and how does these films contri yete to heaviness of one root or a nonher. Data Analysis Coming to America In this film, Eddie spud plays the role of Prince Akeem a short to be force of his affluent province Zamunda.The plot revolves around Prince Akeems motivation to find his bride , since the type of wives being turnedered to him by the current king his Father, seems to be like Prince Akeems soon to be slaves, due to their nature to obey and please whatever the Prince will desire. That part alone shows the characters of women, (in this movie majority of the women are black) especially evolution out from poverty will do anything in force(p) to get unify to a Prince.Although women here is not considered minority but the negative image conveyed by the film of their characters, pull out for the main lady Lisa McDo easy (in which Prince Akeem soon wed due to her distinct quality), are basically like Gold diggers and will do absolutely anything just to get gamey. Another incident, in which the film portrays and intentionally to be funny, was when Akeem and his cousin went to America to find the bride of his dreams, they encountered deceit and theft mainly from black wad living in the impoverished field of honor of Queens New York.Criticisms here depends on the type of viewer perception, some may react that not all Black people are like that, and they might even add that they just did those plagues due to poverty, but others will just look at it as unintentional and as a way to create a joke, but based on a study social and political themes the proportion of blacks who resort to military concourse has risen substantially over the last decade (Powers, Rothman & Rothman, 1996, p. 179).Also a characterisation worth noting, was when it showed the future Father in-law of Akeem, Cleo McDowell (played by rear Amos) running his business, which have almost the perfect resemblance of McDonalds due to its contact usage of the Golden Arches, in which he calls the McDowells. This scene portrays another character of the black people engaged in playful deceit for the purpose of comedy, although ugh the scene naturally funny but again may create a message that in general black people are simply like that.Even on the way Cleo treats his daughte r on finding the right man, he always preferred a wealthy young man to be his future son in law, then Akeem here for his purpose to be loved by the way he is and not for money he assumed the role of a despicable man, in which his Cleo totally disliked and preferred the more well off son of a rich family Daryl.Deceit lies and the motivation for money seems to be the underlying themes of this movie, although created as a comedy to somehow cover these types of elements, it was authentically shown clearly when the stereotyping ended on the scene when Akeems father the King went to New York to find his son and stop the potential marriage of him and Lisa, offered a significant amount of money to Cleo for his devils, Cleo then stood up for his hidden principles and reacted as if it was an insult to treat her daughter like that.This could a positive averment and probably the filmmakers created this scene for viewers not to generalize and jump into conclusions on the nature of the black people in this film. Scarface On the movie Scarface, Al Pacino plays the role of a Cuban refugee named Tony Montana. As an immigrant Tony was depicted as a rattling strong character incapable of fear especially dictated by his goal of making it big on a antithetic democracy like America. This characterization of Al Pacino explains the American immigrant experience suggesting that crime which is the centerpiece of which is medicines cannot be disconnected from the American Dream (Sharret, 2001).After him and his beat out friend Manolo (played by Steven Bauer) went out the refugee camp after a roily rebellion, they found themselves on having a job as dishwashers. This shows that in America most of the jobs for immigrants with little education end up as glooming collared workers doing hard work and retentive hours. This kind of work only made Tony feels that it was nothing different from back home in which he move anything possible to get away of the communism grip. He decid ed to results into what he feels he can do best.Violence and do drugs dealing, this has made the movie somehow more dangerous in respect to all immigrants difficult to live an honest hardworking life in America, as viewers may perceive that this is the way immigrants are, due to their background on all poverty or a tough government from their own countries. consequently stereotyping again may exists, however this film offered much more than just the immigrant experience, from that foundation it went to describe the both the horrific image of drugs in the contemporaneous world and the violence and corruption attached to it (same as Sharret, 2001).It was not long when Tony Montana thought he had achieved the American Dream, he kil lead his former boss, took away his business and his wife and even his own bodyguard to work for him. This happened as portrayed, that tension occurs when minorities (like Tony the immigrant from Cuba) and his White boss tried but failed to resolve issue s and misunderstandings (Powers, Rothman & Rothman, 1996, p. 180). Tony knows he cannot do it alone without the help of corrupt bureaucrats who actually assist drug traffic as part of the realpolitik of post-war foreign policy (same as Sharret, 2001).Those scenes have a tremendous negative effect on not only to the violence by an immigrant but on his ability to employ the system of the society in America that seems to support the imagination of rival and acquisition as hallmarks of success and accomplishment (same as Sharret, 2001). There was what it seems as turning vertex in the film, in which Tony, His Wife Elvira (played by Michelle Pfeiffer) and Manolo went to a fine dining restaurant.In this occurrence scene Tony now considered rich and powerful, went beyond as he insulted his wife for being a drug addict, and made a scene with the whole considered to be the elite programme of the society. The film conveys the message that this kind of society only knows where to point f ingers when it comes to trouble and it a lot of times it goes to the immigrants whom they perceived are the bad guys and specializes on dealing drugs and partaking in violence.This explains that those other diners may have no idea what an immigrant experience could be and possibly do not care except if it affects them directly, in this particular scene it did. A lot of people considered Scarface as an epic gangster film, due to its themes of the capitalist lifestyle (in contrast to communism) violence and effects of drugs. Borat Borat is a film, that is supposed to comedic in nature, turned out as a heavy racial context, full of offensive themes for both the Kazakhstan people and the Americans as well according to its critics.But is it really? again depending on the type of viewers point of view. The film portrayed the country of Kazakhstan as a medieval society in which rape and incest are cheerfully accepted, and sometimes combined, some audiences knows that this kind of joke is not on the country itself, but on the western perception that foreign cultures are reluctant (Ryan, 2006).The ploy is centered on the character Borat Sagdiyev, (played by Sacha Baron Cohen) Kazakhstans second-best reporter, going to America to analyze the attitude and nature of the American people. In his travel accompanied by his producer Azamat Bagatov (played by spate Davitian), Borat tries to learn the American sense of humor by interviewing an American coach, this scene conveys that the joke in which adding the word and exclamation Not At the end of every sentence is proudly of American Origin ( same as Ryan, 2006).The other particular scene in which Borat interviewed the Veteran Feminists of America, can be considered nothing more sophisticated than a prank at the write down of those who dont know what the joke is, or even that in that location is a joke (same as Ryan, 2006). But this scene in particular portrayed the seriousness of the Veteran Feminists which either way d oesnt privation to be stereotyped as Borat would prefer. This somewhat immigrant experience of Borat has also led him to his infatuation to television personality Pamela Anderson.Borat then meet with a group of drunken friends ( which this scene is not scripted) and these guy showed Borat a videotape of Pamela Anderson having agitate with his then boyfriend Tommy Lee, having seen this Borat feels very depressed, since in his country the belief of virginity is very important, and before he have seen the video he thought that Pamela is assuage a virgin, this again portrays that Kazakhstan people are primitive as well as naive.The guys who showed Borat the video claimed (since this was an actual putz) that they are unfairly represented in the film as sexist louts because of their drunken state, but during that scene their celebratory screening of the tape reveals their sexism indisputably (Metz, 2007). There a lot of scenes in the film in which can be easily concluded as racist tag s or false stereotyping, but as some of the scenes which are shot are not scripted like, the scene discussed earlier, explains some of the actual nature of the Americans on how they sometimes treat an immigrant especially if they dont have any background of a specific immigrant.The immigrant experience here shows that people in whom he interacts can be well perceived as if they are trying to understand the minority, but at the same time holding their ground if they see something is not just normal by their standards. Conclusion The influence of film on audience perception can really be significant. Especially when dealing with the social order of the society. In this study we analyzed three films on which the corresponding focal point is the immigrant experience by the main characters.They all seemed reacting on what the new society already has in place for them. For us viewers, we see these types of minorities and a lot of times we simply cannot enjoy a film as it is, due to the di sturbance of the negative messages of violence, offensive jokes, racism, drugs, sexism and lot of subliminal messages the film itself conveys to us. The task with this is clear from this study, that it indeed has an effect that can possibly create oppression for a particular group, and in this case the immigrant minorities of our society.Reference List Charles, L. (2006). Borat ethnic Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. United States iv by Two. De Palma, B. (1983). Scarface. United StatesUniversal Pictures Landis, J. (1988). Coming to America. United StatesEddie Murphy Productions Metz, W. (2007) cheat Porn Film Genre, Reception Studies, and Chris Kentis Open Water. Film Criticism 31. 1 Powers, S. , Rothman, D. , and Rothman, S. (1996).Hollywoods America Social and Political Themes in Motion Pictures. Boulder. CO Westview Press. Sharrett, C. (2001). Cinematic Drug Wars. USA Today, Society for the Advancement of Education. Sienkiewicz, M. & Marx, N . (2009). beyond a Cutout World Ethnic Humor and Discursive Integration in South Park. Journal of film and video 61. 2 Ryan, G (2006). Thongs of freedom The Kazakh Ace Reporter Uncovers Uncomfortable Truths about the US. New Statesman